Back in the 1980s, I worked as a waiter for a fancy
restaurant on the Westside of Los Angeles. Several of my regular customers were wealthy
real estate investors, so I suppose it’s only natural that they dined regularly
with other rich real estate types. Often, those “others” included the renowned
Donald T. Sterling.
Very early on, Mr. Sterling made an impression on me. I
found him to be arrogant and self-absorbed. He made no secret of his
disdain for mingling with anyone who wasn't white, like himself. But if an hour or two of social courtesy
with a black colleague could bring him a promising deal, then so be it. He
owned a hotel down the street, where people of color constituted a healthy
portion of the housekeeping staff. But behind the front desk? Nope.
.
.
In 2006, the U.S. Department of
Justice sued because he refused to rent his Beverly Hills properties to black
families.
In 2009, he was quoted as telling Clippers executive Elgin Baylor that he (Sterling) wanted to build a team of "poor black
boys from the South and a white head coach."
His numerous adulterous liaisons
are well-known; indeed, he makes no attempt to conceal them. He frequently buys
advertising space in the Los Angeles Times, boasting of his charitable deeds,
transparently disguised as tributes from others.
(And that’s just the stuff we know
about, that became public.)
Finally, in April 2014, TMZ
released a secret recording of Sterling with paramour V. Stiviano, telling her
that she shouldn’t bring her black friends to Clippers games. Suddenly, THAT
was a bridge too far. The straw that broke the camel’s back. The final insult.
.
Huh? Let’s get real. The Stiviano
recording didn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know. Yet the NAACP was
about to give him an award! REALLY? Their fake surprise and outrage now, and
their cancellation of the award ceremony, are just plain dishonest.
The things I know firsthand, are
based on maybe a couple dozen brief encounters where I overheard bits and
pieces of conversations while serving coffee and clearing plates. If he spoke so freely in public, within earshot of strangers, I can only imagine his candor among trusted associates behind closed doors. Surely they knew him well, and could speak up at any time. Oh, but then they wouldn’t get
that million-dollar deal.
Forty years of bad behavior.
Adultery. Chronic cruelty. An ego as big as all of Los Angeles. And yes, racism. That wasn’t enough to make
you show him the door, decades ago? Up until now, Sterling has managed to buy
his way out of trouble. Or out-maneuver the other guy in court. Or sweet-talk
the league into letting him stay. Can’t blame him, when other people enable him
by letting him off easy.
For some reason, in our present
society, racism seems to be the only unforgivable sin. He could be prosecuted for dozens or hundreds of crimes, but
we don’t talk about those. It’s as if he killed hundreds of people by driving
his Bentley through the crowd at the Rose Parade, but he gets off with a ticket
for driving on the sidewalk. Five hundred-dollar fine, please. Next case.
Should Sterling lose his business?
I don’t know. But when the punishment is that he walks away with a check for $2
billion from Steve Ballmer, it doesn’t seem like a penalty at all.
I don’t get it. Perhaps the whole
Sterling affair says more about us, than him.
No comments:
Post a Comment